Flachbett-Scanner mit Tiefenschï¿½rfe fï¿½r 3D-Objekte Scanographie
Ein kleiner Marktï¿½berblick mit Bestenliste

Ich habe mich auf die Suche gemacht nach einem Scanner, der auch Objekte wie z.B. runde Flaschen erfassen kann. Viele Erfahrungsberichte habe ich auf dieser Seite zusammengefasst. Wichtig ist auf jeden Fall, dass das Gerï¿½t einen CCD-Chip besitzt. Die heutige Flachbauweise von Canon LIDE-Scannern oder den typischen Multifunktionsgerï¿½ten wie Epson SX415 hat eine andere Technologie inne und kann nur rund 1mm tief scannen.

Die Angaben der folgenden Topliste sind meistens in Zentimeter, soweit nicht anders angegeben. Anschlieï¿½end folgen noch einige Kommentare zu diesem Thema aus dem Netz.

Epson Perfection V700: gschï¿½tzt ca. 5-6cm, Preis heute ca. 350-450ï¿½, erschienen 2006, Brilliante Qualitï¿½t, siehe http://www.flickr.com/photos/luketrash/5354575249/sizes/l/in/photostream/
Epson Perfection 3170 Photo: 4,3cm, (20-50ï¿½ gebraucht, im Handel 2003-2007 fï¿½r ca 150ï¿½)
Epson V30 1,4cm (20-40ï¿½ gebraucht, Erschienen 2008-2011 ca 80ï¿½)
evtl ach v33? neupreis 2010 bis 2012 78ï¿½, gebraucht 35-65ï¿½, ï¿½other features: depth of field: 14 mm Instruction level
CanoScan 5600F 0,9+ cm (http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artjan13/dw-scanner-type.html gebraucht ca. 50-70ï¿½
HP Scanjet 8200 0,8 + testsieger
EpsonPerfection 3200 Photo 0,7
canoscan 4200f: ca. 0,4cm Schï¿½rfentiefe (10-30ï¿½ gebraucht), integrierte Durchlichteinheit, sehr fix, USB2.0, schlechte Software, Windows 7 TWAIN Treiber verfï¿½gbar, Tool von Vista funktioniert mit Win7. Ich habe den Scanner selbst getestet.
chip test: Epson Perfection 1660 Photo teifenschï¿½rfe 0,4cm 2003 (heute ca 22ï¿½ gebraucht inkl versand) usb2
Epson 2400 photo: 0,4cm
Canoscan 9900F 0,5
HP 7400c 0,4
Canoscan 8000f 0,5
Canon 5000f 0,4
Umax Astra 6700 0,4 oder 0,5
Win 7 32 + 64bit epson v500 photo gebraucht ca 90-105 aber: the scanner itself has a very shallow depth of field which is perhaps 2 or 3 mm
CanoScan 9000F (evtl auch Mark II) 0,3 Der Canon die neue Version II hat eine LED-Beleuchtung eingebaut, die schneller bereit ist.

Aber auch Multifunktionsgerï¿½te wie Hp OfficeJet Pro L7580 / L7480 (OK: L7780 / Officejet 9130 ) oder Canon Laserbase MF3110 / Pixma MP830. oder Epson AcuLaser CX11NF mit Fax und ADF (OK: Epson Workforce WF-2530W) und viele weitere Scanner-Modelle liefern angemessene Ergebnisse. http://www.druckerchannel.de/artikel.php?ID=1473&seite=16 http://www.druckerchannel.de/artikel.php?ID=2118&seite=20 http://www.druckerchannel.de/artikel.php?ID=1924&seite=18 http://www.druckerchannel.de/artikel.php?ID=1110&seite=19 OKI MB470 http://www.tecchannel.de/produkte/pc-mobil/multifunktionsgeraete/oki-mb470/test/ http://druckerwlan.plotterprinter.info/epson-perfection-v33-scanner-4800dpi-usb-scan-to-pdf/

Wieso kï¿½nnen das heutige Gerï¿½te nicht mehr so gut? Man muss nur einen CCD-Scanner nehmen.
Popeljoe2006-04-25, 22:32:30
Also ich hab grade nen Canoscan 4200F in der Mache gehabt und war ï¿½ber die Geschwindigkeit und die Quali der Scans echt angetan!
Blï¿½ten kannst du mit richtig guter Tiefenschï¿½rfe scannen und einen Dia Einsatz fï¿½r 3 Dias hat das Ding auch! ;)
Kostet imo knapp 90ï¿½...
http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?artno=UPUC10&
P1
preis heute: 10-35ï¿½, windows7 komatibel

--
I'm aware of at least one 3D scanner manufactured by HP called "Top Shot". It uses an array CCD instead of a linescan CCD + scanning mechanism, so it should also capture images faster, although the effective resolution is likely not quite as high as a traditional flat-bed scanner. The downside/upside (depending on your needs) is that the scanner is part of an all-in-one printer.
I've casually played with one and came away impressed, but I don't have any in-depth experience with the product.
Here's a link: http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/topshot/index.html#.UIGFUG_A9QQ.
-
Kari Vierimaa , May 08, 2008; 06:45 a.m. My gf has done some stuff on our $100 Canon 4400F (DE: 20-30 gebraucht, 40 neu). It works fine for photos too, just check levels and sharpen a bit. For negatives cheap flatbeds are not that hot but it depends what kind of quality you need. Web sizes and small prints are ok, but even 8x10 is pushing it. (from 35mm). Epson V700 (and newer) seems to be the best all-around flatbed as can be seen from the price tag. - use a Microtek i900. It produces some beautiful scans. One of the nice features is that the cover is removable. So is the glass for cleaning. Of course you should always protect the glass with clear mylar or acetate. I would also recommend SIlverfast AI instead of the Microtek software. It's much faster and, more importantly, has much more sophisticated control. gebraucht ca. 150ï¿½ - V500 Testbilder http://www.flickr.com/photos/gvelasco/3806515033/in/photostream/ - The Epson Perfection V30 Flatbed Scanner scans photos, documents, and even 3D objects,
-
http://flickrhivemind.net/Tags/epson,scanography/Interesting
-
http://scannography.org/tips/Patri01-howto.html
-
It sounds like the Epson Expression 10000XL would be much better suited for my purposes.
I did read about it, and it seems to offer much better focusing control and the depth of field.
-
Have you tried the HP Scanjet 4670 See-Through scanner? It is supposed to let you take pictures of objects by simply placing the scanner on top and as such is not expected to be perfectly level... I can't confirm this though, only that I read it somewhere.
anderes review sagt, nicht besonders tief
-
Following up on my V30 purchase. The scanner has a 'deep focus' -- I can stand 10 cm away from the bed and still be in focus -- and unfortunately it has a lot of distortion. I can't tell whether this is due to the physical construction of the device or to some correction in the software; it may be trying to lay flat the parts that are further away.
-
The Epson Perfection V30 can handle documents that measure up to 8.5 x 11.7 inches. The unit attaches to a PC or Mac via USB 2.0, and is therefore capable of transfer speeds up to 40 times faster than the Xerox 7600, which has a USB 1.1 port. The Epson scans at densities up to 4,800 x 9,600 dots per inch (dpi), which is sufficient to capture film and film negatives without deterioration. Unfortunately the product has no transparent materials adapter to conveniently take advantage of its film-worthy scan density. The impressive dpi range is nevertheless useful because any high-density scan will enlarge without noticeable deterioration. And crops and subsets of a high-density image will expand without being perceived by the human eye as degraded. Included software supports Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to allow the editing of scanned text from within a word processor. Photo editing software supports the restoration of faded photographs.
V30 The flatbed scanner lid is designed to lift 180 degrees to accommodate 3D objects, photo albums and scrapbooks. Because the scanning engine is a Charge Coupled Device (CCD), scans with a depth of field up to half an inch are possible. By way of contrast, the Canon CanoScan LiDE 200 and the Xerox 7600 have a depth of field measured in millimeters because their scanning engines use a newer alternative technology called Contact Image Sensors (CIS).
--

--
Someone suggested the Epson 3170 here has a depth of field around 1.7 in.
neupreis 2003-2009 150-200, heute 20-70ï¿½ gebraucht
Der 3170er ist nach Rï¿½cksprache mit der Epson-Kaufberatung baugleich mit dem Epson 3200.
-
I scan jewelry periodically with an Epson V750 and the depth of field is satisfactory. (800ï¿½)
-
A Cruse scanner would be perfect for this. The quality of the scans are amazing.
-

The best DOF I have ever experienced was from a Nikon AX1200 (re-badged Umax) mid-ï¿½90s; it had surprising depth. Various Epsons since have been OK and focusable (focus stacking? Smiley, but have read that a lot of the Canon LIDE scanners were very shallow.
-
epson v500 oder v00
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/BB/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6309
http://www.flickr.com/groups/580313@N21/discuss/72157621888612689/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/580313@N21/discuss/72157625883246129/

60-130 fï¿½r v500
-
Because contact image sensor technology allows a depth of field measured in millimeters, large format scanners that use the technology are not ideal for scanning anything that isnï¿½t in close contact with the scan bed. For scanographic applications and scans of opened books, the Plustek OpticPro A320 is a better large format scanner than the Mustek Scan Express A3 USB 2400 Pro because the Plustek employs color charge-coupled device technology, which supports a depth of focus approaching half an inch.
-
Epson perfection 3170 is $100 or less and works great! It is often recommended by the pros especially for those of us just starting out. I got so excited about scanning I created a site to share as much as I could learn.
www.scanner-magic.com
-
I use a Microtek i900. It produces some beautiful scans. One of the nice features is that the cover is removable. So is the glass for cleaning. Of course you should always protect the glass with clear mylar or acetate. I would also recommend SIlverfast AI instead of the Microtek software. It's much faster and, more importantly, has much more sophisticated control.
You can see some of my work here: http://www.timfleming.com/scanner/scanner.htm
-
To aid in selection of affordable scanners our research reveals the following best buys
for the budget conscious: HP Scanjet G3110, Visioneer OneTouch 9520 and Epson Perfection V30.
-
Mustek BearPaw 4800TA
2448ta pro

versuch es mal mit einem Mustek BearPaw, der kann sogar eine Maus die du mit der Runden Seite
auf die Glasflï¿½che legst einscannen und das gestochen scharf.

hier mal ein Link zu einem Mustek:
Mustek BearPaw 4800 TA Pro II Flachbettscanner: Amazon.de: Computer & Zubehï¿½r

ich selber nutze den 2448TA Plus und der funktioniert auch unter Windows7, den bekommt man aber nur noch gebraucht.
---
Ja, habe einen 9900F. Spitzengerï¿½t und von den kleineren Modellen hï¿½rt man auch nur gutes.
MfG!
http://www.test.de/Scanner-Verblueffend-scharf-1045877-1045924/
ï¿½Sehr guteï¿½ Ergebnisse im Prï¿½fpunkt ï¿½Schï¿½rfentiefe bei 3D-Objektenï¿½ hatten vier Scanner, sechs Gerï¿½te waren ï¿½gutï¿½.
in der Bildqualitï¿½t trotz ihrer recht geringen 600 x 1 200 dpi die besseren Werte. Sie sind in der Farbwiedergabe und beim 3D-Scan leistungsfï¿½higer. Digitale Kussmï¿½nder wie auf dem Aufmacherfoto sehen auch mit dem Plustek Opticpro S6 und dem Visioneer 4800 USB richtig gut aus ï¿½ und das ab 90 Euro

Epson Perfection V370 Photo Flachbettscanner: scharfe Scans auch von 3D-Objekten mit CCD-Technologie.

-

Das Scannen umfangreicher Bï¿½cher oder 3D-Objekte lï¿½sst sich dank des besonderen Deckels des Epson Perfection V37, der sich um bis zu 180 Grad ï¿½ffnen lï¿½sst, mï¿½helos bewerkstelligen. Auch wenn Teile des Buchs oder des gescannten Objekts das Scannerglas nicht berï¿½hren, werden Sie vom Scanner fokussiert und prï¿½zise erfasst. Dafï¿½r sorgt die CCD-Bildsensortechnologie von Epson, die eine hï¿½her Tiefenschï¿½rfe ermï¿½glicht, als die Kontaktbildsensor-Technologie (CIS, Contact Image Censor) der meisten vergleichbaren Scanner. http://geizhals.de/?cat=scn&xf=2359_CCD%7E777_USB+2.0%7E2881_Flachbettscanner#xf_top
Plustek Optic Pro S6 Preiswerter Scanner, ohne Durchlichteinheit, sehr gute Schï¿½rfentiefe bei 3-D-Objekten, Auflï¿½sung 600 x 1200 dpi. http://www.test.de/Testsieger-zum-Verschenken-Vom-Guten-das-Beste-1068993-1068975/ auch dort gelistet: Umax Astra 4500 (Photo), Canon Canoscan D 1250 U2F

EPSON PERFECTION 2580 PHOTO TREIBER WIN 7 32 + 64 BIT
http://www.ebay.de/sch/Scanner-/11205/i.html?Bildsensor=CCD&_dmpt=DE_Elektronik_Computer_Scanner&Scannertyp=Flachbettscanner&LH_Auction=1

Flachbett-Scanner mit Tiefenschï¿½rfe fï¿½r 3D-Objekte Scanographie Ein kleiner Marktï¿½berblick mit Bestenliste

Flachbett-Scanner mit Tiefenschï¿½rfe fï¿½r 3D-Objekte Scanographie
Ein kleiner Marktï¿½berblick mit Bestenliste